The Next Step in WHO’s War

In our last installment, Pharma’s Profit Over Safety Exposed, we discussed an interview conducted by Tucker Carlson with evolutionary biologist Dr. Bret Weinstein, who has been researching COVID-19 and the biological and social structures that led to a simultaneous worldwide lockdown and mass vaccination drive. In Part 2, we unpack the second half of that interview dealing with the WHO (World Health Organization’s) treaty to be ratified in May of this year. Again, I will paraphrase Weinstein’s statements and opinions from the interview. 

The WHO is revising the structures, that allowed a small group of dissidents to upend the approved pandemic narrative through podcasts and alternative media sites.  The dark forces seem to think they need new measures to silence those who blew the COVID-19 lies wide open. These tyrants saw their experiment fail in real time and are now taking precautions to increase the censorship and flow of information so that the next time there is a global emergency, they will succeed in keeping the masses uninformed and trample all over basic human rights.

While we all want to conveniently forget about the trauma that COVID-19 induced and simply move on with our lives, Weinstein warns us not to do so. To prevent a similar disaster of epic proportions from ever occurring again, we all need to keep talking about the roles of medicine, pharma, and public health as they relate to pandemics. He remarked, “Given what you now know, would you want to relive a pandemic like the Covid pandemic without the tools that allowed you to ultimately in the end see clearly that it didn’t make sense to take another one of these shots or to have your kids take [one].”

The mechanism for silencing all opposition is a treaty called the Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Accord in which modifications to global public health regulations are being added to an existing treaty. The WHO seems to keep changing the name of this document. Weinstein thinks this is designed to confuse people and game the search engine technology if anyone wants to track the changes. In other words, they are making it as confusing as possible.

Weinstein believes that the ability to silence independent media is under serious discussion at the international level. Weinstein is deeply troubled and gives us this chilling warning, 

“In fact, I think it is fair to say that we are in the middle of a coup that we are actually facing the elimination of our national and our personal sovereignty, and that is the purpose of what is being constructed. And it [the WHO treaty] has been written in such a way that your eyes are supposed to glaze over as you attempt to sort out what is under discussion. And if you do that, then come May of this year your nation is almost certain to sign on to an agreement that in some utterly vaguely described future circumstance, a public health emergency which the director general of the World Heath Organization has total liberty to define in any way that he sees fit.” He goes on, “Nothing prevents climate change from being declared a public health emergency that would trigger the provisions of these modifications, and in the case that some emergency or some pretense of an emergency, shows up, the provisions that would kick in are beyond jaw dropping.”

What has been vaguely proposed is that the WHO and its signatory nations will be allowed to define a public health emergency. Once declared, they will be entitled to mandate the remedies, including but not limited to vaccines and gene therapy technology. They could forbid the use of other medications like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine. They will also be able to dictate the ability to travel using health passports. This sounds like a rerun of what we all experienced the last time. 

The WHO will also be able to determine how these measures are discussed publicly on social media and other platforms using the protocols of misinformation (errors), disinformation (intentional errors or lies), and misinformation. Weinstein reminded us about the memo written by the DHS in 2022, calling anyone guilty of these offenses a domestic terrorist.  Terrorism now has an international legal designation, which can cause all of one’s rights to be revoked.

With this modified WHO treaty, it is not just your own country you have to worry about but the entire global governance system that will be able to dictate to nations how to treat their citizens. A pandemic or some concocted global emergency can create a loophole to remove rights. Due to manufactured fear by puppets in the media, most people will be willing to allow their rights to be stripped away if they are promised health and safety for themselves and their families.

Weinstein thinks there is very little hope that the US will not sign the treaty as the powers that be or those that have captured our government want these changes to be able to walk all over our constitutional rights. He states, “I suspect that some powerful set of forces has decided that consent of the governed is too dangerous to tolerate. It has begun to unhook it. And we do not know how this works. We can see some of the partners who are involved in this, but I don’t think we know ultimately who is driving this or where they are going.”

He thinks the West has already collapsed in that the values still function superficially. Still, they could easily evaporate under the right circumstances, as we all saw at the pandemic’s beginning. He laments that all our institutions have been intentionally captured and hallowed out and are now a parody of what they should be. Weinstein believes that the people promoting this treaty are unaware of what kind of hell and chaos they could be creating.  Drunk with power, they are putting everyone, including themselves, in grave jeopardy by systematically destroying the structures on which we all depend.

At the end of the interview, Tucker asked Weinstein why he stood up for the truth. He responded, “I don’t think I had a choice. I literally cannot understand how I would sleep at night, how I would look at myself in the mirror if I didn’t say what needed to be said.”  He also quoted a speech from RFK that he has thought of often and said rarely, “There are fates far worse than death.” He is right on this account, but how many of us will lose our lives to preserve something we believe in?

Weinstein suggests that the fate of humanity depends on everyone doing what is needed to beat this wicked scheme. If everyone feels it is personally too hazardous to stand up to global tyranny, then nothing will happen to change the course of history. He reminded us that we vastly outnumber them.

Weinstein calls the force we are up against “Goliath,” and its fatal flaw was to banish all of the competent, courageous, truth-telling people from the institutions.  Consequently, Goliath unintentionally created a dream team of great thinkers and truth-tellers working together to defeat a historic battle against tremendous evil. Weinstein ends on this note of hope, “I hate to say it, or maybe I like to say it. I don’t think it’s a slam dunk, but I like our odds.” Let’s pray he is right.