Pharma’s Profit over Safety Exposed

Recently, Tucker Carlson interviewed an evolutionary biologist, Dr. Bret Weinstein. Weinstein was a faculty member of a college in Washington state. In 2017, he and his wife, Heather (who was also a faculty member), were outspoken about not complying with a racially motivated “Day of Absence,” in which minority students proposed that white faculty members remain off campus for the day. As a result, student groups and fifty faculty members demanded that Weinstein be fired. Eventually, Weinstein and his wife resigned from the college, which seems providential, as we shall soon see.

Weinstein appears to be a man of integrity, willing to lose everything. He and Heather now host the Darkhorse Podcast. One of his most widely viewed episodes was early in the pandemic with guests Dr. Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, who were all questioning the vaccine’s safety and efficacy and discussing the use of Ivermectin as a prophylactic. The video was censored and removed from YouTube and other social media sites shortly after publishing it.

His interview with Tucker was one of the best explanations, in layman’s terms, why the vaccines were so dangerous, why billions of them were administered worldwide, how the grassroots resistance to the COVID-19 narrative took hold, and how the elites are currently planning for the next global crisis.  I will be paraphrasing his statements and opinions from this interview below.

Part 1 – The Game of Pharma

As a highly educated and skilled biologist, Weinstein assumed he was an expert, but the COVID-19 crisis sent him back to school, and with his new-found freedom, he delved deeply into exactly what was going on. He began his search by questioning the mRNA injection. He said alarm bells originally went off when it was claimed that the mRNA shot was deemed “safe” even if it was harmless since no one knew the long-term effects.  He used a brilliant analogy to prove this point, “If I say I drove home drunk, but I made it without harm, so it was safe. You know that I have said something false.” He and his wife knew that the label “safe” was a lie, which prompted them both to start seriously questioning everything.

On realizing that the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt and only in search of profits, he explained, “If you think about what Pharma is, we tend to imagine that it is an industry hell-bent on finding drugs that will make us healthier. That’s not what it is. In fact, Pharma is healthy when people are sick.  Pharma is an intellectual property racket.”

He elaborated that pharmaceutical companies portray the drugs they create as safer and more effective than they are. They also spend millions of dollars lobbying medical institutions, medical journals, medical societies, and governments to direct people to drugs that they may not be inclined to take on their own. Pharma’s profits go through the roof when the disease is severe and widespread. Profits also increase when inexpensive competing drugs are deemed unsafe, when a government mandates a particular drug, or when it is determined to be the so-called standard of care. During the pandemic, the stars aligned for Pharma as all those conditions were met, causing drug companies to earn an easy 90 billion from the mRNA shots in 2021-2022 alone. 

Carlson inquired why public health and governmental leaders were obsessed with everyone taking the mRNA shots and insistent that no other therapeutics/treatments be used. Weinstein answered, “Pharma owned what was potentially the biggest pharmalogical cash cow conceivable,” in the form of the mRNA injections.  Pharma was not going to waste this opportunity.  Were some of these enormous profits shared with those who promoted widescale vaccination?

Weinstein then went on to explain the technology behind the injections. The mRNA injections create a platform to produce a protein that the body is supposed to make on its own, like insulin, but due to a deficiency, it does not. A lipid (fat) nanoparticle is used as the delivery method, sending the mRNA message directly into the body’s cells, which begin to produce these proteins on their own. This technology could be used to create all kinds of new treatments with very little additional expense or alteration. All you would have to do is swap out the desired protein sequence, as the delivery method had already been developed.

Weinstein added, “It could allow you to reformulate every vaccine currently on the market and what’s more, the property in question would allow this whole process to be streamlined at an incredible level because effectively all you needed was a genetic sequence from a pathogen and you could literally type it into a machine and produce a vaccine that was already in use but for the swapping out of the antigen in question.” A bonus would be that if it were understood that the mRNA delivery process was safe, pharma would not have to go through exhaustive and expensive clinical trials on every new drug they created that used this technology.

However, this mRNA transvection platform has a severe safety flaw. Weinstein says, “It never would have ever gotten through even the most cursory safety tests.”  There was no mechanism to target the lipid nanoparticles, which could be taken up by any cell they encountered in what Weinstein called a “haphazard” fashion. We were told that the lipid nanoparticles from the vaccine would stay at the injection site in the arm. This did not happen. The particles leaked out and traveled all over the body.

Suppose the lipid nanoparticles go haphazardly around your entire body, landing in your joints and causing arthritis. In the case of vital organs like the heart, brain, kidneys, liver, or reproductive system, the body will destroy the good cells thinking they are invaders. This causes autoimmune damage. If this happens in your heart or brain, which has a low capacity for repair, the damage is permanent. That may be why we have seen so many heart attacks, strokes, or sudden deaths with many young, vaccinated athletes who have collapsed on the field. 

But why did the vaccine travel all over the body? Weinstein responded that a proper injection should be pulled back or pushed in further if blood is observed in the syringe before administering the dose. Blood in the syringe would indicate that the circulatory system had been breached. Without repositioning the needle, the medicine would be injected directly into the patient’s bloodstream. Instead of following this standard procedure, the advice for the mRNA shots was not to plunge the needle farther past the vein or artery because this might create additional pain to the recipient and possibly cause vaccine hesitancy for the second shot or subsequent boosters.

Pharma bypassed regular safety testing to bring an incredibly lucrative product to market. Billions of shots were given worldwide. Weinstein hypothesizes that Pharma knew the technology had potential danger but recognized that an emergency, like COVID-19, would bypass the normal regulatory safeguards streamlining the safety testing since the public demanded the product to return to everyday life or keep their jobs. Pharma also knew that the natural resistance to taking a new, untested technology would be overcome in emergencies such as COVID-19.    

Billions of these shots were given worldwide. When asked what the total injury toll of the mRNA injections has been, Weinstein pointed to the work of Joseph Fraiman and his colleagues and Peter Doshi, who looked at Pfizer’s data from their safety trials. In a suspicious move, Pfizer only allowed one month of data collection before vaccinating its control group, making it impossible to detect any further harm. This should be a huge red flag. Fraiman et al. found a 1 in 800 per shot (not per person) rate of serious adverse events, which suggests a high mortality rate in the safety trials.

If you extrapolate this statistic to the billions who were vaccinated, a large amount of people may have been harmed. Weinstein said that at a COVID-19 crisis conference in Romania, he “Saw a credible estimate of something like 17 million deaths globally from this technology.”

There is a silver lining in this whole debacle. A small group of dissidents upended the plans of the most wealthy and powerful forces behind these crimes against humanity – a miracle.  The dark forces thought they owned enough of the media and enough government officials that they could spin any narrative anywhere around the world. They almost succeeded.  But a small group of highly trained, intelligent, courageous, and moral people started posting podcasts that began to reach millions of people. This both surprised and frightened these people and upended their plans.  They may now be looking for a rematch.

We will examine that in Part 2: WHO Pandemic Preparedness Plan, which will come out on Thursday.