If you think the struggle against Marxism is waning, think again. For freedom-loving people, the communist ideology is a growing cancer meant to exterminate religious faith, and a country’s history and tradition are alive and well. One of the tenets of Marxism is to erase the past and displace it with nondescript symbols purposely enacted to separate a populace from its history. To achieve this end, Marxists initiate a process of cultural revolution within a country.
The effects of a cultural revolution don’t happen suddenly; it is a prolonged effort to dismantle what is known and familiar with “new” ways of thinking and acting. The recent iteration comes from our neighbors across the pond. Great Britain, no longer a great nation, has taken steps to reidentify their currency. Those in charge are rationalizing that the move will rid the country of racism and white supremacy, supposedly symbolized by World War II hero Winston Churchill.
Churchill isn’t the only one who is receiving a pink slip. Other historical authors, Shakespeare and Jane Austen, will also be unceremoniously removed. The only person who will be free from the wrecking ball is the elitist and globalist-loving King Charles III. The change ultimately reflects the rise of unfettered migration, especially from Muslim nations, who have never heard of or care about England’s history.
The Bank of England will replace the historical and pivotal figures of Britain’s history with wildlife indigenous to the islands. The reason given is almost as ridiculous as claiming Churchill was a white supremacist. The chief cashier at the Bank of England, Victoria Cleland, tried to convince naysayers that the new notes featuring animals would be harder to counterfeit than those with human portraits. How this would be the case is still an unanswered question.
Besides the counterfeiting aspect, placing wildlife on banknotes is supposedly meant to highlight an important element in the British Isles, claims the chief cashier. Placing those images on stamps would be appropriate, but with money. It is like saying an African nation should put a hippo on its bills. None of them has so far.
Deep-sixing historical figures in British history is a bow to immigrants and to the redefinition of the country as somehow limited by the past. A deer did not fight against German fascism, but with the help of the United States, Churchill was instrumental in defeating Nazi Germany. Otherwise, German would be the first language in England.
An indigenous bird, no matter how beautiful the chirp, can match the words and insight of the master of prose, Shakespeare. A squirrel never interprets, critiques, and comments on 18th-century English gentility in the form of a novel like Jane Austen. These figures in English history are now persona non grata because the cultural revolution in England is being run by DEI ideology and a nod to foreign culture that invaded their land. Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong would be proud of the cultural devastation now unfolding with our once-closest ally.
Plenty of critics have said Britain is already a lost cause, and their analysis may not be far off. When a country rejects its history and the contributions it has made to its society, Great Britain will be relegated to the ash heap of history. It is not impossible; plenty of other countries have preceded them.