Charlie Kirk was brutally assassinated just twenty days ago. Since then, the official narrative peddled by the governor of Utah, the FBI, and other law enforcement agencies regarding this tragedy is getting more and more difficult to believe.
Below, we have twenty-five questions that have yet to be reasonably addressed.
- Why wasn’t an ambulance on standby, ready for an emergency with such a large crowd assembled at Utah Valley University?
- Why was Charlie taken to the hospital by his security detail in an SUV without medical personnel or lifesaving equipment?
- Was there an official autopsy performed? If so, by whom?
- Why were some of Charlie’s security detail seen using hand signals and gestures right before he was shot?
- Was the mark on the front of Charlie’s throat an entrance or exit wound?
- How could a .30 – 06 caliber bullet from a Mauser M 98 bolt-action rifle not have exited Charlie’s body when it allegedly hit his throat (mostly cartilage) and spine (thin bones)?
- Did the doctor who treated him really say that his “strong healthy bones” kept the bullet lodged just underneath his skin?
- Why did a video of the shooter show him limping down the street as if he had a gun down his pants, but was later shown bending his knees as he climbed a staircase?
- Can a Mauser M 98 bolt-action rifle with an attached scope fit down the leg of a pair of jeans?
- In the video of the shooter running on the roof, why didn’t he cast shadows while shadows appeared elsewhere?
- How could someone with no military training jump off a 14-foot roof with a heavy rifle in hand and not hurt himself?
- Who is George Zinn (the man who first claimed he shot Charlie) and why was he there?
- George Zinn was coincidentally at the scene of the September 11th attacks in New York and the 2013 bombing of a Salt Lake City marathon. What are the odds of this?
- Why was the camera directly behind where Charlie was sitting removed shortly after the shooting? Wasn’t this area an active crime scene?
- Why is the area where Charlie was sitting currently being renovated with concrete slabs, and why is the roof behind where the Turning Point tent was positioned being repaired?
- Why do the text messages between the shooter and his furry boyfriend seem like a bad movie script – something definitely not written by two 22-year-olds – and why aren’t there any time stamps on the messages?
- Why do these text messages check off every box needed to indict the alleged shooter, including the confession, the motive, and the murder weapon?
- Who came to the alleged shooter’s house with out-of-state license plates in the days before the shooting?
- Why did a book published on Amazon called The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack come out one day before the shooting?
- Why did “Armed Queers of Salt Lake City” scrub their websites and social media presence after the killing?
- Why was a song posted to SoundCloud in August of 2025 called Charlie Kirk Dead at 31?
- Why did Governor Cox speak at the press conference announcing the arrest of the alleged shooter instead of law enforcement officials?
- Why did Kash Patel look so uncomfortable (more like a hostage than the FBI Director) during said press conference?
- Why is Bibi Netanyahu appearing on all kinds of media, blaming radical Islamists for the assassination?
- Why were there allegedly military spy planes and drones flying over the university the morning of the shooting?
Some of these questions may have logical answers. The media is not asking them, nor are the authorities supplying them. Saying we got the guy doesn’t squelch the suspicion.
Here’s a thought: Maybe all these conflicting stories were put out there to confuse the public and destabilize the country. This may be another evil plot orchestrated to pit left vs. right, conservative vs. progressive, religious vs. atheists against one another to spark a civil war. But by whom?
It is not so outlandish to be suspicious because we have just learned years later that over 270 FBI agents were embedded in the January 6th protest. This was never mentioned in the initial narrative of the events of that day. It is often said that politics is a blood sport.
One thing is for sure: we will never get the full story regarding Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It will be memory-holed just like all the other strange and unbelievable events of our lifetime, reminiscent of the murder of JFK in 1963; the murder of RFK and MLK in 1968; the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995; September 11th in 2001; the Las Vegas mass shooting in 2017; and President Trump’s attempted assassination in Butler, PA in 2024.
Sad as it is, we can no longer trust our government to tell us the truth. They blatantly lie and expect the public to disregard what we can see with our own eyes. Their methods of controlling the stories came to light during the COVID-19 pandemic.
And if they did it then for political reasons, why not now?
One thought on “Are we getting the True Story about Kirk’s Assassination?”